Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.003
Title: The variants of an LOD of a 3D building model and their influence on spatial analyses
Authors: Biljecki F. 
Ledoux H.
Stoter J.
Vosselman G.
Keywords: 3D GIS
CityGML
Geometric reference
LOD1
LOD2
Issue Date: 2016
Publisher: Elsevier B.V.
Citation: Biljecki F., Ledoux H., Stoter J., Vosselman G. (2016). The variants of an LOD of a 3D building model and their influence on spatial analyses. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 116 : 42-54. ScholarBank@NUS Repository. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.003
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Abstract: The level of detail (LOD) of a 3D city model indicates the model's grade and usability. However, there exist multiple valid variants of each LOD. As a consequence, the LOD concept is inconclusive as an instruction for the acquisition of 3D city models. For instance, the top surface of an LOD1 block model may be modelled at the eaves of a building or at its ridge height. Such variants, which we term geometric references, are often overlooked and are usually not documented in the metadata. Furthermore, the influence of a particular geometric reference on the performance of a spatial analysis is not known.In response to this research gap, we investigate a variety of LOD1 and LOD2 geometric references that are commonly employed, and perform numerical experiments to investigate their relative difference when used as input for different spatial analyses. We consider three use cases (estimation of the area of the building envelope, building volume, and shadows cast by buildings), and compute the deviations in a Monte Carlo simulation.The experiments, carried out with procedurally generated models, indicate that two 3D models representing the same building at the same LOD, but modelled according to different geometric references, may yield substantially different results when used in a spatial analysis. The outcome of our experiments also suggests that the geometric reference may have a bigger influence than the LOD, since an LOD1 with a specific geometric reference may yield a more accurate result than when using LOD2 models. © 2016 International Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Inc. (ISPRS).
Source Title: ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
URI: http://scholarbank.nus.edu.sg/handle/10635/148049
ISSN: 09242716
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.003
Rights: Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
Appears in Collections:Staff Publications

Show full item record
Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormatAccess SettingsVersion 
2016_isprs_geometric_references.pdf3.72 MBAdobe PDF

OPEN

NoneView/Download

SCOPUSTM   
Citations

16
checked on Oct 10, 2018

Page view(s)

47
checked on Oct 11, 2018

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


This item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons